For example, Phil was quiet when some of his Conservative colleagues spoke out against being muzzled by Prime Minister Harper in the House of Commons. Did Phil join them? Absolutely not! Phil is still repeating the same old drivel that is, in all likelihood, written by 22-year-old staffers in the PMO (e.g. see this speech, and this speech, and this speech.... etc. ad nauseam). In this blog, we have already compared Phil's efficacy as a Member of Parliament to that of a fire hydrant. For the time being, it appears that neither the fire hydrant nor the Honourable Member for Brant has any intention of changing its inanimate ways.
But on to more exciting matters. Prime Minister Harper recently announced that you, the hard-working, taxpaying, country-loving citizen, are going to be paying 100% of the costs of a new Conservative Party initiative: attack ads targeting Justin Trudeau.
Your tax dollars at work |
The issue facing Phil today is: will he stand with his principled colleagues and refuse to mail out these taxpayer-funded attack ads? Or is he going to continue to play the part of the fire hydrant, the muzzled MP, and obey the Prime Minister?
1 comment:
Given that on April 25th, he complained about the NDP and Liberal mailings that have gone out, I sure hope we won't issue the attack ads.
But he has also refused to say outright either way, so...
Post a Comment
All comments will be posted except for instances of profanity, spam, hate speech, defamation, etc.